Withdrawal of life support often stepwise

NEW YORK (Reuters Health) - Rather than being an abrupt action, withdrawal of life support often occurs in a sequential or “stuttering” fashion over a period of time, such that the whole process takes longer than a day, according to a new study.

Once someone is determined to be brain dead, there is no medical reason to prolong life support. Nonetheless, “We found that sequential withdrawal of life support is not as rare a phenomenon as previously believed,” Dr. J. Randall Curtis, from the University of Washington in Seattle, said in a statement. “It occurred in nearly half of the patients we studied.”

The findings, reported in the American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, indicate that this approach may be taken so that families can be more prepared.

The study involved an analysis of medical records and family questionnaires for 584 patients who died in an ICU after withdrawal of life support.

For 271 of the patients, the withdrawal of life support took longer than a day, the report indicates.

Compared with patients who had a shorter withdrawal period, these patients were younger, had longer ICU stays, were less likely to have cancer, and had more decision-makers involved.

Family satisfaction with the care the patient received tied in with a longer duration of life-support withdrawal.

“The ‘take home’ message is not to prolong the withdrawal of life-sustaining therapies to the possible detriment of the patient, but to facilitate better communications between ICU clinicians and patients’ families,” Dr. Curtis emphasized.

“When physicians make a decision to withdraw support, they have often not prepared the family sufficiently,” he explained, “and physicians may consequently embark on ’stuttering’ withdrawal of life support in order to have more time to prepare the family.”

SOURCE: American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, October 2008.


Related Posts:

NEW YORK (Reuters Health) - Doctors are often reluctant to discuss a seriously ill patients’ uncertain prognosis with family members, but a new study suggests that most families want doctors to address the patients’ uncertain outlook openly and candidly. “The vast majority of families of critically ill patients want physicians to openly discuss the prognosis, even

Full Post: Most families want doctors to be candid

NEW YORK (Reuters Health) - People with severe asthma who are allergic to fungal organisms benefit substantially from treatment with the anti-fungal drug itraconazole, new research shows. To check out this strategy, a trial was conducted in the UK involving patients who needed high doses of steroids to control their asthma and who were sensitive to

Full Post: Antifungal treatment helps some asthma patients

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - Primary care doctors in the United States feel overworked and nearly half plan to either cut back on how many patients they see or quit medicine entirely, according to a survey released on Tuesday. And 60 percent of 12,000 general practice physicians found they would not recommend medicine as a career. “The whole thing

Full Post: Many doctors plan to quit or cut back: survey

NEW YORK (Reuters Health) - Fathers who are involved in their children’s prenatal care are more likely to be around for the long haul, whether they marry the child’s mother or not, new study findings suggest. The findings, say researchers, suggest that such early involvement — even more so than marriage, per se — is crucial

Full Post: Dad’s involvement during pregnancy is key: study

NEW YORK (Reuters Health) - Although many doctors worry about breaking bad news about seriously ill patients to their kin, most family members want to know the truth, a study published Monday suggests. Research has shown that many doctors hesitate to be fully open with critically ill patients and their families — opting, for example, to

Full Post: Families want doctors to share bad news

Site Navigation

Most Read



  • kinwrite.com@gmail.com